GrammatiCats: Pronouns With Comparisons
Hey, guys - and if I haven't said it yet, thanks so much for all your great suggestions for grammar posts. Let's blow the dust off these kitties and get back to work!
My lovely assistant Willow will now help me select a letter from the mailbag.
...on second thought, let's pull one from the blog comments.
Matt Borgard writes:
"I don't really know the name for this, but proper subject/object usage of a pronoun at the end of a sentence.
'Erika is more tired than [him/he].'"
A terrific question, is it not? This thorny problem has blown the minds of generations of writers. (Maybe I shouldn't be amazed, though - Matt's never shied away from the tough stuff. If you are a fan of sci-fi/fantasy, gaming, and/or the progressive politics of geek fandom at large, his blog is unmissable. Check him out - and in the meantime, get those pinkies in the upright and locked position.)
So here's the deal, cats and kittens. You know how you use an ellipsis ("...") to show missing speech, like when a character trails off in speaking or you delete part of a quotation? Well, there's another kind of ellipsis, which we might call grammatical or linguistic ellipsis, and all it essentially means is that you've omitted words from a sentence, often to avoid repetition. Take this example:
Can you see where the words were omitted?
Yep: if you were going to write this whole thing out exactly-completely, it would read:
God might forgive her for xeroxing her hairballs, but Hewlett-Packard never would forgive her for xeroxing her hairballs.
That would be redundant and boring and ruinously unfunny, of course, which is why we used ellipsis to shorten it in the first place. And we do this ALL THE TIME.
Whose house (is it)?
(It is) Run's house.
Will you do the honors, or shall I (do the honors)?
If she's having a beer, I'll take one (beer) too.
So let's go back to Matt's sentence. If, as Matt did in his original comment, we get rid of the ellipsis and write out all the words, it's much clearer: Erika is more tired than [him/he] is.
"Well," you may say, "'Erika is more tired than he is' makes perfect sense, but if I want to keep it short and sweet, 'Erika is more tired than he' sounds kinda strange."
Indeed it does! But the cool thing about the ellipsis test is that it lets you be clearer in your meanings. For example,
Let's say Mirror-Cat wants to discredit his strange new rival, but isn't sure whether to say:
Destroy him, human. He respects you even less than me.
or
Destroy him, human. He respects you even less than I.
How can he decide? Well, look what happens when you take out the ellipsis:
He respects you even less than (he respects) me.
He respects you even less than I (respect you).
The meaning of the sentence changes based on the pronoun he uses!
"Well," you may say, "I can see the difference when we write it out, but I wouldn't have picked up on the difference if I were just reading normally, and I don't think many other people would either."
This is very true, hypothetical reader. Normally, most of us would assume that sentence #1 was what was meant, regardless of whether it used "I" or "me". If we wanted to communicate sentence #2, we'd say, "He respects you even less than I do" to remove any ambiguity.
So, cards on the table: here are three useful things to know about this whole ending-a-comparison-with-a-pronoun thing.
1. It's not a cut-and-dried issue - there are learned grammarians on both sides of the "he" and "him" fence. (If you want to hear more about that, Grammar Girl's article covers both sides of the argument exceptionally well.)
2. With that said, if you are dressing your writing up in its Sunday best, you should probably do as we've done here: use the ellipsis test to choose the pronoun that would still be correct if you added back the words you skipped over. This is the safest and surest way to prevent knuckle-rapping from the five-pinkie people in your life.
3. In all other cases, feel free to choose your use based on your ear and your audience. Don't invite trouble at the honky-tonk because you suggested to Bobby Ray that Bubba Jim has a bigger prison tat than 'he'. (And if you're writing the scene for your novel, certainly don't let Bobby Ray say it either!)
Because as we've said before, there's really no such thing as "correct" and "incorrect" grammar. There's only the kind that gets you your desired result, and the kind that doesn't. So here on the Fourth of July, let me encourage you to say Happy Birthday to America by celebrating one of our most famed pastimes: speaking whatever the hell way we feel like and damn the torpedoes!
Oh! And a special thanks to today's GrammatiCats, who are probably too busy hiding from fireworks to truly enjoy their newfound celebrity:
1. Willow, courtesy of the one and only Frank the Magnificent!
2. Our very own hellbound Peaches
3. Sawyer, courtesy of the fabulous M.E. Kinkade (who, by the way, is a bodacious blogger and an excellent editor - get over there and get a piece of what she's cooking.)
Questions? Kitties? Send them in!
My lovely assistant Willow will now help me select a letter from the mailbag.
...on second thought, let's pull one from the blog comments.
Matt Borgard writes:
"I don't really know the name for this, but proper subject/object usage of a pronoun at the end of a sentence.
'Erika is more tired than [him/he].'"
A terrific question, is it not? This thorny problem has blown the minds of generations of writers. (Maybe I shouldn't be amazed, though - Matt's never shied away from the tough stuff. If you are a fan of sci-fi/fantasy, gaming, and/or the progressive politics of geek fandom at large, his blog is unmissable. Check him out - and in the meantime, get those pinkies in the upright and locked position.)
Pinkie Rating: 4
So here's the deal, cats and kittens. You know how you use an ellipsis ("...") to show missing speech, like when a character trails off in speaking or you delete part of a quotation? Well, there's another kind of ellipsis, which we might call grammatical or linguistic ellipsis, and all it essentially means is that you've omitted words from a sentence, often to avoid repetition. Take this example:
Can you see where the words were omitted?
Yep: if you were going to write this whole thing out exactly-completely, it would read:
God might forgive her for xeroxing her hairballs, but Hewlett-Packard never would forgive her for xeroxing her hairballs.
That would be redundant and boring and ruinously unfunny, of course, which is why we used ellipsis to shorten it in the first place. And we do this ALL THE TIME.
Whose house (is it)?
(It is) Run's house.
Will you do the honors, or shall I (do the honors)?
If she's having a beer, I'll take one (beer) too.
So let's go back to Matt's sentence. If, as Matt did in his original comment, we get rid of the ellipsis and write out all the words, it's much clearer: Erika is more tired than [him/he] is.
"Well," you may say, "'Erika is more tired than he is' makes perfect sense, but if I want to keep it short and sweet, 'Erika is more tired than he' sounds kinda strange."
Indeed it does! But the cool thing about the ellipsis test is that it lets you be clearer in your meanings. For example,
Let's say Mirror-Cat wants to discredit his strange new rival, but isn't sure whether to say:
Destroy him, human. He respects you even less than me.
or
Destroy him, human. He respects you even less than I.
How can he decide? Well, look what happens when you take out the ellipsis:
He respects you even less than (he respects) me.
He respects you even less than I (respect you).
The meaning of the sentence changes based on the pronoun he uses!
"Well," you may say, "I can see the difference when we write it out, but I wouldn't have picked up on the difference if I were just reading normally, and I don't think many other people would either."
This is very true, hypothetical reader. Normally, most of us would assume that sentence #1 was what was meant, regardless of whether it used "I" or "me". If we wanted to communicate sentence #2, we'd say, "He respects you even less than I do" to remove any ambiguity.
So, cards on the table: here are three useful things to know about this whole ending-a-comparison-with-a-pronoun thing.
1. It's not a cut-and-dried issue - there are learned grammarians on both sides of the "he" and "him" fence. (If you want to hear more about that, Grammar Girl's article covers both sides of the argument exceptionally well.)
2. With that said, if you are dressing your writing up in its Sunday best, you should probably do as we've done here: use the ellipsis test to choose the pronoun that would still be correct if you added back the words you skipped over. This is the safest and surest way to prevent knuckle-rapping from the five-pinkie people in your life.
3. In all other cases, feel free to choose your use based on your ear and your audience. Don't invite trouble at the honky-tonk because you suggested to Bobby Ray that Bubba Jim has a bigger prison tat than 'he'. (And if you're writing the scene for your novel, certainly don't let Bobby Ray say it either!)
Because as we've said before, there's really no such thing as "correct" and "incorrect" grammar. There's only the kind that gets you your desired result, and the kind that doesn't. So here on the Fourth of July, let me encourage you to say Happy Birthday to America by celebrating one of our most famed pastimes: speaking whatever the hell way we feel like and damn the torpedoes!
Oh! And a special thanks to today's GrammatiCats, who are probably too busy hiding from fireworks to truly enjoy their newfound celebrity:
1. Willow, courtesy of the one and only Frank the Magnificent!
2. Our very own hellbound Peaches
3. Sawyer, courtesy of the fabulous M.E. Kinkade (who, by the way, is a bodacious blogger and an excellent editor - get over there and get a piece of what she's cooking.)
Questions? Kitties? Send them in!